Is President Bola Tinubu Politically Indisposed? A Public Affairs Assessment

This post has already been read at least 11437 times!

By Andrew Kurmi

The debate surrounding President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s political disposition has intensified following recent claims by his loyalists that the president is “indisposed.” But beyond political rhetoric, Nigerians deserve a factual assessment of what such a statement means and whether it reflects current realities.

Why Are His Loyalists Saying He Is “Indisposed”?

Political loyalists often deploy this language when public sentiments turn negative or when governance lapses become too visible to ignore. It is a strategic shield meant to reduce criticism, delay accountability, and control narratives.

A Look at Tinubu’s Political Portfolio

President Tinubu has indeed enjoyed a long political journey—from senator representing Lagos West, to governor of Lagos State for eight years, to the presidency. However, longevity in politics does not automatically translate to effective leadership. What Nigerians truly desire is a record of decisions that improve daily life, not just a record of holding power.

Has He Been Indispensable or Disposable?

A truly indispensable leader is one whose performance makes citizens demand his return without the need for aggressive campaigns. Nigeria has not witnessed such an atmosphere.

Instead, within two years:

• Inflation has skyrocketed
• The naira has collapsed
• Transport, food, and housing costs have multiplied
• Industries are shutting down
• Insecurity is worsening across multiple regions

If this represents indispensability, then Nigerians must redefine the term.

Sector-by-Sector Assessment

Economy:
The removal of fuel subsidy and the unification of the exchange rate were introduced without adequate cushioning. The result: a fragile economy and millions pushed into deeper poverty.

Security:
Despite promises of decisive action, insecurity persists—kidnapping, banditry, terrorism, and rural displacement remain widespread.

Transportation:
Transport costs are unbearable, with no stable alternative system.

Healthcare:
Doctors are emigrating, hospitals lack funding, and no structural reforms have been implemented.

Industries & Manufacturing:
Businesses are collapsing due to high energy costs, lack of forex, and an unfriendly environment for investors.

Social Services:
Education, welfare, and public administration systems remain weak and slow.

Who Is a Master Strategist?

A master strategist is a leader who:

• Understands the people’s problems before making policies
• Tackles insecurity fearlessly and without favour
• Uses intelligence effectively
• Appoints competent technocrats, not political loyalists
• Thinks beyond party politics
• Builds institutions, not propaganda
• Prepares solutions before rolling out policies

Judging by these criteria, the Tinubu administration still has a long way to go.

Conclusion

If “indisposed” means being out of touch with citizens’ suffering, unable to deliver on campaign promises, or surrounded by loyalists who excuse shortcomings, then yes—President Tinubu appears politically indisposed.

But beyond Tinubu, Nigeria’s long-standing issue is the docility of its citizens—a society that rarely demands accountability with sustained pressure. Leaders act indispensable only when the people behave as though they are.

Until Nigerians rise with one voice and demand better, governance will remain a cycle of promises, disappointments, and excuses.

*Andrew Kurmi is a Public Affairs Analysts and writes from Lagos, Nigeria.

StreetReporters.ng

This post has already been read at least 11437 times!