Bayelsa Governorship: Why APC Has No Candidate in December 5 Election by Fred Amakom

Timipre-SylvaChief Timipre Sylva has been nominated as the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the forthcoming December 5th 2015 gubernatorial election in Bayelsa state. Chief Timipre Sylva had previously been elected twice as governor of Bayelsa State namely in 2007 & 2008. The 2007 election was nullified by the court of appeal and chief Timipre Sylva contest and won the re- run election where upon he was elected the second time and served for about a cumulative period of four years and seven months as the governor of Bayelsa State. He now seeks to be elected a 3rd time Governor of Bayelsa State in the said forthcoming elections.

The relevant constitutional provision is section 182(1)(b) of the constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended, which states as follows:

Section 182(1) No person shall be qualified for election to the office of governor of a state if —

(a) ……………

(b) He has been elected to such office at any two previous elections.  

It is thus apposite to ask if chief Timipre Sylva who, having already been elected twice and served for a cumulative period of about four years and seven months as the governor of the state, is qualified to seek for re-election a third time for a fresh term of four years and thereby seek to serve as governor of the state for more than the maximum period of 8 (eight) years allowed by the constitution.

On the issue of the maximum tenure of eight years that person can serve as Governor of a State, the supreme court in MARWA VS NYAKO (2012) 6 NWLR part 1296 page 199 at 280F—G held as follows:

“From the language used in Section 180 of the 1999 Constitution, it is very clear that the Constitution intended that the Governor of a State shall have a tenure of four years from the date he took the oaths of allegiance and of office and nothing more, though he may spend less where he dies, resigns or is even impeached. In all, a Governor has a maximum tenure of eight (8) years under the 1999 Constitution.”

When the election of a Governor is nullified and he participates in a subsequent re-run election ordered by the Court and win, such a Governor whose election was nullified, cannot be said to be said to be elected only once. Such a Governor notwithstanding the nullification of the first election has been elected twice. It was for that reason that the Supreme Court held that a Governor cannot be said to have been ‘first elected as Governor under the Constitution’.

ALSO READ  Gombe Governor Hails NYSC's Moral Impact, Contribution to Human Resource Needs

“A person elected following a re-run election cannot be said to have been ‘first elected as Governor under this Constitution’ except he was not the winner of the earlier election or first election.”

In this case, Chief Timipre Sylva won both the first election that was nullified and as well as the re-run election, thereby being elected twice as the Governor of Bayelsa State.

Chief Timipre Sylva was one of the parties to that case in the Supreme Court. It was in fact that case that terminated the tenure of Chief Timipre Sylva as the Governor of Bayelsa State. He is thus bound by the said decision of the Supreme Court in that case especially as he was the one that won the nullified election and the subsequent re-run election.

The Supreme Court therefore clearly recognized the earlier nullified election of Governor Timipre Sylva as having led to his first election. Thus his success in the re-run election was obviously his second election and incidentally in the quoted provision of Section 182(1)(b) of the Constitution has barred him from contesting again having been previously elected twice.

The Supreme Court also in the above case whilst considering the effect of the nullified election clearly rejected the doctrine of nullity and its consequences usually traced to Lord Denning in the case of UAC VS MCFOY where Lord Denning stated as follows:

“If an act is void then it is in law a nullity. It is not only bad, but incurably bad. There is no need for an order of the Court to set it aside. It is automatically null and void without more ado, though it is sometimes convenient to have the Court declare it to be so. And every proceeding which is founded on it is also bad and incurably bad. You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there. It will collapse.”

ALSO READ  Health Sector Reform: Gombe Joint Health Sector Union Applauds Governor Inuwa Yahaya

The Supreme Court in rejecting the said principle, held at page 278 of the said case as follows:

“To say that the above principles are based on facts which are not material in this case is to state the very obvious. Secondly, the Court is in many cases/circumstances required to declare an act void before it becomes so, otherwise it remains valid and binding as is evident in our laws relating to elections where elections are presumed valid until declared null and void by the Courts. In such a situation, if you put something on the illegal act – the period prior to the nullification – it will stay put contrary to the general dictum on nullity as propounded by Lord Denning.”

The Supreme Court at page 286B – F of the said judgment, in acknowledging the reality of the annulled election as an election that actually took place further held as follows:

“I hold the considered view that to uphold the validity of the acts of the Governors in office prior to the nullification of their election and reject the period they spent in office during which time they performed those acts in the determination of the period of their tenure is contrary to common sense and the clear intention of the framers of the Constitution.

“The fact that there was an election in 2007 as a result of which the 1st Respondents (Governors) took their oaths of allegiance and of office are facts which cannot be wished away, just as the acts which they performed while occupying the seat. The said Governors may not have been de jure Governors following the nullification of their elections, which is not supported by the acceptance of their acts in that office as legal and binding on all and sundry, they were certainly Governors de facto during the period they operated ostensibly in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and Electoral Act and as such, the period they so operated has to be taken into consideration in determining the terminal date of their tenure following, what I may call, their second missionary journey vide a re-run election particulary as the Consitution unequivocally grant a tenure of four years to a person elected Governor of a State calculated from the date he took oaths of allegiance and of office which was the 29th day of May, 2007.”

ALSO READ  CNPP Breaks Silence on Legal Tussle over Deregistration of Political Parties

The Supreme Court also is rejecting the contention that the earlier nullified election of the Governors, including that of Chief Timipre Sylva be ignored in the computation of their tenure of office held that such a situation would create Governors that would perpetually serve as Governors forever. The Supreme Court at page 285C – D held as follows:

“To accede to the argument of the Respondents is to bring uncertainty into the clear provision of Section 180(2) of the 1999 Constitution which would render the tenure of the Governors indefinite as what it would take an elected Governor whose election is (sic) nullified to remain in office almost indefinitely or for life is to continue to win the re-run the elections which would then be nullified to continue the cycle of impunity.”

Thus on the state of the law as contained in the Constitution and interpreted by the Supreme Court, Chief Timipre Sylva as been elected twice as Governor of Bayelsa State and is therefore not qualified to contest the said election as the candidate of All Progressives Congress (APC) as otherwise he would be seeking to serve as Governor of Bayalsa State for more than the Maximum period allowed by the Constitution. The All Progressives Congress (APC) does not therefore have a qualified candidate in the said forthcoming Gubernatorial Elections.

Fred O. Amakom II is the Publicity Secretary of Truth Movement of Nigeria (TMN), Abuja. 08052814266

> is your BREAKING NEWS platform. Do you have Breaking news for us?
Call: 08175047979
Or Email Us:
Follow Us on Twitter @streetreporters
Join Our Fans on Facebook:
Visit Our Website:

The Street Reporters Newspaper is your BREAKING NEWS platform. Do you have Breaking news or Opinion article for us? | *Call: +234 817 504 7979 | Or Email Us: | Follow Us on Twitter | Join Our Fans on Facebook: | Follow us on Instagram | Advertise With Us: +2348035823617 | Visit Our Website:

Share and Enjoy !

What's your thought about this story? Write your comment here

%d bloggers like this: